Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Official Representation
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Official Representation
Support - I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support clearly correct --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 21:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the anonymous sources debate, and my response to it, which itself necesitated an apology to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules, and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --April Arcus 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --The Merovingian (C - E) 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support Should be common sense, but if this policy ensures that things are clarified then thats fine by me. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:04, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support So say we all. (Doh! Just broke the policy...) --Steelviper 07:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support By your comman--no, suggestion. (Sorry SV had to follow up ;-)) --FrankieG 11:36, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
I'll give this until Sunday, August 13th for further discussion. If there are no objections during that time, then I'll roll this out after the 13th. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:30, 10 August 2006 (CDT)
Start a discussion about Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Official Representation
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Battlestar Wiki the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Official Representation.
This is a talk page to discuss the contents of this article. It is not meant to be a discussion forum.
