Talk:Edward James Olmos/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
For anybody who might have a little more evidence backing this up, Edward's Wikipedia article states explicitly - quoting the podcast - that he won't be with the show for Season 3. I'm certain that by now that's been sussed out as owing to Ron Moore's sense of humor, but without a little more evidence by statement on the article's talk page is just an argument to assertion. Would any of the dedicated volunteers over here be so kind as to head over to that article, explain the confusion, and delete the statement? | For anybody who might have a little more evidence backing this up, Edward's Wikipedia article states explicitly - quoting the podcast - that he won't be with the show for Season 3. I'm certain that by now that's been sussed out as owing to Ron Moore's sense of humor, but without a little more evidence by statement on the article's talk page is just an argument to assertion. Would any of the dedicated volunteers over here be so kind as to head over to that article, explain the confusion, and delete the statement? | ||
==Directing BSG== | |||
(note: this is what a typical cast talk page entry is like (see above)): I can't find a specific article at the moment but he's said it multiple times in various interviews. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 00:09, 5 April 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:09, 5 April 2006
Hello. This is the discussion page for the Edward James Olmos article. Note that this always existed, there was just never anything to type in here. --The Merovingian 15:54, 11 March 2006 (CST)
EJO Wikipedia Article
For anybody who might have a little more evidence backing this up, Edward's Wikipedia article states explicitly - quoting the podcast - that he won't be with the show for Season 3. I'm certain that by now that's been sussed out as owing to Ron Moore's sense of humor, but without a little more evidence by statement on the article's talk page is just an argument to assertion. Would any of the dedicated volunteers over here be so kind as to head over to that article, explain the confusion, and delete the statement?
Directing BSG
(note: this is what a typical cast talk page entry is like (see above)): I can't find a specific article at the moment but he's said it multiple times in various interviews. --The Merovingian (C - E) 00:09, 5 April 2006 (CDT)