Battlestar Wiki talk:Site images: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Site images
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:You'll need to send it to me via e-mail, so I could FTP it from there. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 12:22, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
:You'll need to send it to me via e-mail, so I could FTP it from there. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 12:22, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
::Alright. --[[User:Bp|Bp]] 12:28, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
::Alright. --[[User:Bp|Bp]] 12:28, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
::That one doesn't resize well to 16x16 so I am sending you a new one with a 16x16 defined. It looked good in details view, but bad in browser. Thanks for the quick work. --[[User:Bp|Bp]] 13:16, 5 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:16, 5 May 2006

favicon[edit]

I thought this would be a good place to talk about this. I created a favicon for this site using the basic BSG circle logo, but ".ico" is blocked in the image upload. Most wikis will rediredct requests for favicon.ico to Image:Favico.ico, so I dont know why it is blocked here. Anyway, please unblock ".ico" so i can upload it and get rid of this ugly "basic page" icon on my toolbar. Thanks. --Bp 12:01, 5 May 2006 (CDT)

It wouldnt work even if you did managed ot upload an ico file because images are actually uploaded withing a series of subdirectories. if you want a favicon to work it must be uploaded to the root folder. and that requires admin ftp access --Mercifull 12:15, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
I'm pretty sure the MediaWiki software redirects requests for /favicon.ico to the image source for Image:favicon.ico. So it would work. But, i'll email it anyway. --Bp 12:28, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
You'll need to send it to me via e-mail, so I could FTP it from there. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 12:22, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
Alright. --Bp 12:28, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
That one doesn't resize well to 16x16 so I am sending you a new one with a 16x16 defined. It looked good in details view, but bad in browser. Thanks for the quick work. --Bp 13:16, 5 May 2006 (CDT)