Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for adminship: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship
No edit summary |
(reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Yeah. I'm already confused... Where are the questions for all condidates, or are they yet to be imported? I'm all for building things to be future-proof, but we voted on the Spoiler Policy without templates and that turned out okay. I am admittedly not familiar with this event, but is there some reason we can't vote on these the same way? --[[User:Day|Day]] 01:36, 17 December 2005 (EST) | : Yeah. I'm already confused... Where are the questions for all condidates, or are they yet to be imported? I'm all for building things to be future-proof, but we voted on the Spoiler Policy without templates and that turned out okay. I am admittedly not familiar with this event, but is there some reason we can't vote on these the same way? --[[User:Day|Day]] 01:36, 17 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:: I'm still working on refining the policy. I wouldn't comment on it until it's done, so as to avoid confusion (and other minor issues that may arise because of it). Thanks! -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 11:41, 18 December 2005 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:41, 18 December 2005
Is the complicated template system really necessary for us yet? We're a small wiki and we all pretty much know each other. --Peter Farago 21:33, 16 December 2005 (EST)
- Yeah. I'm already confused... Where are the questions for all condidates, or are they yet to be imported? I'm all for building things to be future-proof, but we voted on the Spoiler Policy without templates and that turned out okay. I am admittedly not familiar with this event, but is there some reason we can't vote on these the same way? --Day 01:36, 17 December 2005 (EST)
- I'm still working on refining the policy. I wouldn't comment on it until it's done, so as to avoid confusion (and other minor issues that may arise because of it). Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin 11:41, 18 December 2005 (EST)