File talk:BSG WIKI Character.png: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of File:BSG WIKI Character.png
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
According to the new rule of keeping things minimal there is no need for this anymore surely. We arnt supposed to post placeholder pictures anymore --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 16:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:37, 8 June 2006
Maybe use something like that silhouette we have around here. --Talos 12:22, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
- ? --Shane (T - C - E) 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
- Exactly. --Talos 14:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
- This is used for the actor image and "user" image tags. The silhouette (not the BSG logo) with a ? is going to be used for Anonymous (Where we can't find a picture), so something that is distictive for characters. --Shane (T - C - E) 12:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
- Eh. I like it. We already use the sillhouette in some character contexts, e.g. the unknown cylon numbers. --Peter Farago 12:32, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --Mercifull 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
According to the new rule of keeping things minimal there is no need for this anymore surely. We arnt supposed to post placeholder pictures anymore --Mercifull 16:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)