(suggested changes) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> should probably be used instead of <nowiki>{{{name}}}</nowiki>, unless there is a use for this template other than on battle pages. "Attacker" and "defender" probably shouldn't be used in the output, though they are fine variable names unless brevity argues strongly enough for "L" and "R." The word "strength" is used twice for two distinct purposes; [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] uses "Combatants" for the first instance, and I am inclined to agree with its usage. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 16:18, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> should probably be used instead of <nowiki>{{{name}}}</nowiki>, unless there is a use for this template other than on battle pages. "Attacker" and "defender" probably shouldn't be used in the output, though they are fine variable names unless brevity argues strongly enough for "L" and "R." The word "strength" is used twice for two distinct purposes; [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] uses "Combatants" for the first instance, and I am inclined to agree with its usage. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 16:18, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
"Combatants" is better than a division of "attacker" and "defender".--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:13, 12 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:13, 13 May 2006
Suggested changes
{{PAGENAME}} should probably be used instead of {{{name}}}, unless there is a use for this template other than on battle pages. "Attacker" and "defender" probably shouldn't be used in the output, though they are fine variable names unless brevity argues strongly enough for "L" and "R." The word "strength" is used twice for two distinct purposes; Fall of the Twelve Colonies uses "Combatants" for the first instance, and I am inclined to agree with its usage. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 16:18, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
"Combatants" is better than a division of "attacker" and "defender".--The Merovingian (C - E) 22:13, 12 May 2006 (CDT)