Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edit of Joe Beaudoin Jr., changed back to last version by Peter Farago) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | :It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ::So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Well, as you're aware, I like to extend new contributors the benefit of the doubt. So "shoot on sight" isn't quite right - it might still be useful to keep a section of this page for tracking dubious submissions. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:45, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
: |
Revision as of 17:56, 10 May 2006
- Citation Consistency, Request for name change, BSG: The Magazine, Citation Format, Character Ages, Railguns, Twelve Lords of Kobol, Magazine Content, To Do, BSG Books, Sources namespace
Expunge List
Is there any central list of articles that need to be "expunged" per the new source policy? One example I found on Citation Jihad mission list:
I wasn't 100% sure that the "Joyce" bit needed to be pulled, but I thought I'd note it so somebody more confident of the application of the rules might smite it. --Steelviper 12:23, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --Peter Farago 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --Steelviper 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- Well, as you're aware, I like to extend new contributors the benefit of the doubt. So "shoot on sight" isn't quite right - it might still be useful to keep a section of this page for tracking dubious submissions. --Peter Farago 12:45, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --Steelviper 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT)