Talk:Occupation/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Occupation/Archive 1
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


"''Yes, it does, but this is now a widespread rumor, and as a reference source, we have an obligation to address its source factually.)''"  Peter, you didn't provide a source when you added the info back.  I realize we might as well mention something, if GalacticaStation and Gateworld are, because even if they are wrong it's out of our hands, but you realize that with the whole "it's a widespread rumor" justification....if *we* report it, we *make* it a widespread rumor.  People see it here, and think this adds even more weight behind the rumor.  We need to tag these things with a sentence along the lines of "no reliably sourced basis for these spoiler's accuracy", etc. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 00:38, 14 April 2006 (CDT)
"''Yes, it does, but this is now a widespread rumor, and as a reference source, we have an obligation to address its source factually.)''"  Peter, you didn't provide a source when you added the info back.  I realize we might as well mention something, if GalacticaStation and Gateworld are, because even if they are wrong it's out of our hands, but you realize that with the whole "it's a widespread rumor" justification....if *we* report it, we *make* it a widespread rumor.  People see it here, and think this adds even more weight behind the rumor.  We need to tag these things with a sentence along the lines of "no reliably sourced basis for these spoiler's accuracy", etc. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 00:38, 14 April 2006 (CDT)
:Look up. The source is on the above bullet point, as specified in the text. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:13, 14 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:13, 14 April 2006

Could you say wher this info has come from? --Grafix 17:16, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

Tigh's Eyes

The quote: Tigh closes his eye, trying not to slide into hopelessness…" really doesn't infer that Colonel Tigh's eys (I like the way that sounds) are injured, it simply sounds more expressing the feeling by closing his eyes. I have no idea how anybody gets that his eyes are injuried by this and so the reference on the article page would be better off moved to the discussion page. -- StrayCat0 20:51, 13 Apr 2006 (PST)

Look, I know that and I agree with you, but if people are rumor-mongering based on this comment, I think the least we can do is tell them where the notion came from. You'll see that I reworded the comment somewhat when I restored it - I hope it's absolutely clear that this is purely conjectural. --Peter Farago 22:52, 13 April 2006 (CDT)
I think the reason for the assumption is that it says "Tigh closes his eye," as in singular. It could just be a typo in the original source though. --Talos 22:56, 13 April 2006 (CDT)


"Yes, it does, but this is now a widespread rumor, and as a reference source, we have an obligation to address its source factually.)" Peter, you didn't provide a source when you added the info back. I realize we might as well mention something, if GalacticaStation and Gateworld are, because even if they are wrong it's out of our hands, but you realize that with the whole "it's a widespread rumor" justification....if *we* report it, we *make* it a widespread rumor. People see it here, and think this adds even more weight behind the rumor. We need to tag these things with a sentence along the lines of "no reliably sourced basis for these spoiler's accuracy", etc. --The Merovingian (C - E) 00:38, 14 April 2006 (CDT)

Look up. The source is on the above bullet point, as specified in the text. --Peter Farago 01:13, 14 April 2006 (CDT)