Talk:Occupation/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:53, 14 April 2006

Could you say wher this info has come from? --Grafix 17:16, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

Tigh's Eyes

The quote: Tigh closes his eye, trying not to slide into hopelessness…" really doesn't infer that Colonel Tigh's eys (I like the way that sounds) are injured, it simply sounds more expressing the feeling by closing his eyes. I have no idea how anybody gets that his eyes are injuried by this and so the reference on the article page would be better off moved to the discussion page. -- StrayCat0 20:51, 13 Apr 2006 (PST)

Look, I know that and I agree with you, but if people are rumor-mongering based on this comment, I think the least we can do is tell them where the notion came from. You'll see that I reworded the comment somewhat when I restored it - I hope it's absolutely clear that this is purely conjectural. --Peter Farago 22:52, 13 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:52, 14 April 2006 (view source) April Arcus (talk \| contribs) (→‎Tigh's Eyes) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:53, 14 April 2006 (view source) April Arcus (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Tigh's Eyes) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:
	The quote: Tigh closes his eye, trying not to slide into hopelessness…" really doesn't infer that Colonel Tigh's eys (I like the way that sounds) are injured, it simply sounds more expressing the feeling by closing his eyes. I have no idea how anybody gets that his eyes are injuried by this and so the reference on the article page would be better off moved to the discussion page. -- [[User:StrayCat0\|StrayCat0]] 20:51, 13 Apr 2006 (PST)		The quote: Tigh closes his eye, trying not to slide into hopelessness…" really doesn't infer that Colonel Tigh's eys (I like the way that sounds) are injured, it simply sounds more expressing the feeling by closing his eyes. I have no idea how anybody gets that his eyes are injuried by this and so the reference on the article page would be better off moved to the discussion page. -- [[User:StrayCat0\|StrayCat0]] 20:51, 13 Apr 2006 (PST)

	:Look, I know that and I agree with you, but if people are rumor-mongering based on this ~~segment~~, I think the least we can do is tell them where the notion came from. You'll see that I reworded the comment somewhat when I restored it - I hope it's absolutely clear that this is purely conjectural. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:52, 13 April 2006 (CDT)		:Look, I know that and I agree with you, but if people are rumor-mongering based on this comment, I think the least we can do is tell them where the notion came from. You'll see that I reworded the comment somewhat when I restored it - I hope it's absolutely clear that this is purely conjectural. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:52, 13 April 2006 (CDT)