Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/April Arcus

Peter Farago

{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} Vote here (4/0/0) ending 05:42 {{{Ending}}} (UTC)

Peter Farago (talk • contribs) – {{{Description}}}

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Accepting, provided Joe approves of the RFA process getting underway. --Peter Farago 18:33, 21 December 2005 (EST)

Support

1. Is this where I say this? Anyway, I think Peter would be a good administrator chiefly because of the experience I had working out the conflict resolution guidelines of Sacred Scrolls. I also often appriciate his edits of the material added by myself and others. He tends to cut out the excess verbage and get right to the point. --Day 01:06, 21 December 2005 (EST)
2. I support this nomination. Peter has a singular balance of administrative, editorial, and wikipedian savvy that may rival any other contributor. His work in creating (and defending the principles of) several key projects that have helped define this wiki into the work it has become has benefitted everyone. --Spencerian 08:58, 21 December 2005 (EST)
3. I support Peter's nomination for his balanced opinions, moderate voice, and open mindedness when it comes to major changes to the wiki. Above all, though, for his strong commitment to the project. --Mason 09:54, 21 December 2005 (EST)
4. I support this nomination as well. A voice of reason in arguments, a solid contributor/editor, and an excellent organizer (through the projects). Peter has taught me a lot in the few direct interactions we've had, and does a good job of leading by example. I think it is pretty obvious that this will not be a controversial nomination. --Steelviper 10:46, 21 December 2005 (EST)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What duties, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Project Pages for a list of projects.

A. I have started and contributed heavily to numerous projects, and have a fairly extensive to-do list available at my user page.

2. Of your articles or contributions here, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. The Twelve Colonies series; various tallies and minutiae; the Citation Jihad.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. I have had an unpleasant discussion with Kuralyov regarding the inclusion of Timeline (RDM) in the Twelve Colonies series some months ago, which I do not hope to repeat. In general I try to maintain a moderate and level-headed tone, which I believe has served me well.