April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Davidkevin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: [[User:Davidkevin|Davidkevin]] 21:19, 19 March 2006 (CST) | : [[User:Davidkevin|Davidkevin]] 21:19, 19 March 2006 (CST) | ||
==Core command== | |||
== Core command== | |||
Thank you for your contribution to the article [[Core command]]. Unfortunately, our [[BW:CITE|citation policy]] requires that contributions such as yours be sourced to a non-wiki location. In this case, merely blogging about your set visit off-site would be adequate - we just need a site that we can link to where a single author can take ownership of the comments in question, and to which other readers can be directed. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:58, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Thank you for your contribution to the article [[Core command]]. Unfortunately, our [[BW:CITE|citation policy]] requires that contributions such as yours be sourced to a non-wiki location. In this case, merely blogging about your set visit off-site would be adequate - we just need a site that we can link to where a single author can take ownership of the comments in question, and to which other readers can be directed. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:58, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
: No problem -- I have a LiveJournal, so I'll write up something later tonight or tomorrow to which I can link my article contribution. Thanks for the heads-up about that. -- [[User:Davidkevin|Davidkevin]] 19:06, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 01:06, 13 February 2007
Use of the term "Actual"
"Actual", as in "Galactica Actual" or "Pegasus Actual" refers to a communication between one party and the actual commanding officer of the other party/entity, in real time. Instead of communication coming from the commanding officer, and being routed through the executive officer, then through a communications operator — the other party is, instead, talking to the actual CO directly. So the term "actual" is a radio or channel protocol, not a callsign. -- Hawke 09:06, 17 March 2006 (CST)
- My misunderstanding. Thank you for the correction.
- Davidkevin 21:19, 19 March 2006 (CST)
Core command
Thank you for your contribution to the article Core command. Unfortunately, our citation policy requires that contributions such as yours be sourced to a non-wiki location. In this case, merely blogging about your set visit off-site would be adequate - we just need a site that we can link to where a single author can take ownership of the comments in question, and to which other readers can be directed. --Peter Farago 18:58, 12 February 2007 (CST)
- No problem -- I have a LiveJournal, so I'll write up something later tonight or tomorrow to which I can link my article contribution. Thanks for the heads-up about that. -- Davidkevin 19:06, 12 February 2007 (CST)