April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I think it's a good point. Naming a beach after a planet is a little absurd. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:06, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | ::I think it's a good point. Naming a beach after a planet is a little absurd. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:06, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::I agree. It sounds so little like a proper name that back when "Bastille Day" aired I decided not to include it. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 17:39, 30 June 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:39, 30 June 2006
Caprica City has a shoreline, perhaps the beach is there. It'd make more sense to name a beach for the city it's on than the entire planet. --Pearse 11:55, 29 June 2006 (CDT)
- This one is tough to justify. Aside from Tigh's comment, there's only speculation to go on, and a very questionable likelihood for more information. Still, it's a place, but I want to truncate the amount of assumed information. Compare with other mentioned-only locales such as Pilgrim Bay and Gup's Point. --Spencerian 08:45, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
- I think it's a good point. Naming a beach after a planet is a little absurd. --Peter Farago 17:06, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
- I agree. It sounds so little like a proper name that back when "Bastille Day" aired I decided not to include it. --The Merovingian (C - E) 17:39, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
- I think it's a good point. Naming a beach after a planet is a little absurd. --Peter Farago 17:06, 30 June 2006 (CDT)