File talk:BSG WIKI Character.png: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of File:BSG WIKI Character.png
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


:[[Image:BSG WIKI User.png]] ? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
:[[Image:BSG WIKI User.png]] ? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
::Exactly. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
::This is used for the actor image and "user" image tags. The silhouette (not the BSG logo) with a ? is going to be used for Anonymous (Where we can't find a picture), so something that is distictive for characters. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
::This is used for the actor image and "user" image tags. The silhouette (not the BSG logo) with a ? is going to be used for Anonymous (Where we can't find a picture), so something that is distictive for characters. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
:::Eh. I like it. We already use the sillhouette in some character contexts, e.g. the unknown cylon numbers. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 12:32, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
::::Yeah, but i think we should use this sillhouette that is merc did. Just trying to keep the "filenames" sane for "site images" at least. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:36, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT)
According to the new rule of keeping things minimal there is no need for this anymore surely. We arnt supposed to post placeholder pictures anymore --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 16:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:58, 11 April 2020

Maybe use something like that silhouette we have around here. --Talos 12:22, 27 April 2006 (CDT)

 ? --Shane (T - C - E) 12:25, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
Exactly. --Talos 14:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
This is used for the actor image and "user" image tags. The silhouette (not the BSG logo) with a ? is going to be used for Anonymous (Where we can't find a picture), so something that is distictive for characters. --Shane (T - C - E) 12:28, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
Eh. I like it. We already use the sillhouette in some character contexts, e.g. the unknown cylon numbers. --April Arcus 12:32, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
Yeah, but i think we should use this sillhouette that is merc did. Just trying to keep the "filenames" sane for "site images" at least. --Shane (T - C - E) 12:36, 27 April 2006 (CDT)

I don't think we should have a specific character to use in the logo, especially in the world of BSG where we have two "factions" of characters the Cylons and Colonials. This is why I prefer silhouette for generic "people" icons --Mercifull 02:38, 25 May 2006 (CDT)

According to the new rule of keeping things minimal there is no need for this anymore surely. We arnt supposed to post placeholder pictures anymore --Mercifull 16:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)