Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
Spencerian (talk | contribs) (+comment) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (+ support) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST) | :I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST) | ||
:I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST) | :I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST) | ||
== [[Adama (TOS)]] == | |||
{{support}} - How better to compare/contrast the new vs. old Adama than back to back features? I didn't nominate this article, but it would be nice to show some TOS love. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:35, 31 October 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:35, 31 October 2006
I've made it my mission to get a silly page as featured article. --BklynBruzer 08:43, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
- I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --Peter Farago 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST)
- I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --Spencerian 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST)
Adama (TOS)
Support - How better to compare/contrast the new vs. old Adama than back to back features? I didn't nominate this article, but it would be nice to show some TOS love. --Steelviper 15:35, 31 October 2006 (CST)