Talk:Nora Farmer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Nora Farmer/Archive 1
(Duck's wife?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Duck's wife?==
==Duck's wife?==
LT, thanks for creating an article on Nora. However, I am not so sure about your assumption that she's not only Tucker's friend, but also his wife. I checked the transcript of the first webisode several times, but I wasn't able to find a line or gesture from which we could infer that they are already married. Perhaps you can clarify this. --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 23:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
LT, thanks for creating an article on Nora. However, I am not so sure about your assumption that she's not only Tucker's friend, but also his wife. I checked the transcript of the first webisode several times, but I wasn't able to find a line or gesture from which we could infer that they are already married. Perhaps you can clarify this. --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 23:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
:By the second, it is certainly strongly implied they're... "special friends" at least. Tyrol's language clearly suggests marriage, based on parallel structure. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 23:34, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:34, 7 September 2006

Duck's wife?

LT, thanks for creating an article on Nora. However, I am not so sure about your assumption that she's not only Tucker's friend, but also his wife. I checked the transcript of the first webisode several times, but I wasn't able to find a line or gesture from which we could infer that they are already married. Perhaps you can clarify this. --Pedda 23:00, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

By the second, it is certainly strongly implied they're... "special friends" at least. Tyrol's language clearly suggests marriage, based on parallel structure. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 23:34, 6 September 2006 (CDT)